Supreme Court 1892, Holy Trinity vs. the U.S. In that Supreme Court
ruling, The Supreme Court
declared, no purpose of action against any religion,
can be imputed to any legislation, state or national, because this is a religious
people, this is a Christian nation.
In the United States of America,
no law, and
no interpretation of any law, can be allowed to be used to restrain, hinder,
censor, or forbid the free exercise of the Christian religion. No federal law. No
State law. No local law, no local ordinance.
No ruling of any court in regard
to the application of that law can be allowed that would hinder the free exercise
The Supreme Court of 1892 declared that it itself did not have the authority
rule on any case in any way that would restrict, hinder, or censor,the free
exercise of the Christian religion.
They declared with that ruling, that no court
in the United States,
including the Supreme Court, has the authority to overrule
the Bill of Rights, with its guarantee of religious liberty.
With this 1892 ruling, the United States Supreme Court echoed the statement
Thomas Jefferson. Thomas Jefferson
said, no power over the freedom of religion is
delegated to the United
states by the Constitution. This means that
States Constituion, with it, the Bill of Rights, is unchanging and unchangeable,
and has the final authority in
all questions regarding the free exercise of
religion. No federal, state,
local authority, under any pretext whatever, has the
power to regulate or ban, or in any way hinder, the free exercise of religion
All of the recent court rulings banning prayer in public places, censoring the
publication of the Ten Commandments, or forbidding the words "under God" in
pledge---all of these rulings are unlawful, unconstitutional, illegal, and
AND VOID. They represent an attempt
by the judges of these courts to ignore,
throw away, and make void the Bill of Rights. They are not lawful. They are
worth the paper they are printed on.
They are null and void. Overruling the Bill
of Rights, is unlawful and impossible.
The Constitution says judges shall hold their offices thru good conduct. The
attempt to overthrow the the Bill of Rights and forbid activity that is guaranteed
by the Bill of Rights is not good conduct.
Trying to convince the American
people that the practice of the rights guaranteed
us in the Bill of Rights is un-constututional, is bad conduct indeed.
It is a tyrannical usurping of power that the Founding Fathers warned us against.
The very intent, from the Founders
of this nation, from the pilgrims, and all
the early settlers, through the writers of the founding documents and beyond
through our entire history, had one primary goal, stated over and over and
every existing public document.
This new nation will be founded upon the law of
Almighty God, as revealed in the Holy Bible.
All Christians of all denominations
shall be free and unhindered in their practice of the Christian religion,
their public worship of Jesus Christ.
The Holy Bible shall be a free
and uncensored book, to be read by all citizens.
in public as well as private places.
The present day Supreme Court has been hearing cases it does not have
constitutional authority to hear, and has been making rulings against the
exercise of religion that it does not have the constitutional authority to
The Founding Fathers of this country knew what they meant by religious freedom.
George Washington, the Father of our country, said, quote: of all the dispositions
and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are
indispensable. in vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who
labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness. unquote.
What did the father of our country
say? He said it is impossible to have
political peace and good government, without the people being religious and
and if any man would want to destroy public religion and morality, he has
to call himself a lover of his country.
George Washington said that. George
Washington also declared, quote. The purpetuity--purpetuity means
continuation--the continuation of this nation depends on the religious education
of the young. It is impossible
to rightly govern the world without God and the
Bible. It is impossible to rightly
govern the world without God and the Bible.
unquote, George Washington.
George Washington also said, October third, 1789, it is the duty of all nations
acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful
his benefits, and to humbly implore His protection and favor.
Constitutional Convention, January 28, 1787.
Benjamin Franklin said, we have been
assured sir, in the Sacred Writings,---Sacred Writings means Holy Bible---that
except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly
believe this, and I also
believe that without his concurring aid, we shall
succeed in this political building no better than the builders of babel. If a
sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His knowledge, it is sure that an
cannot rise without His aid.
Early American Christian patriot, Patrick Henry, who was famous for saying
liberty or give me death, also said, there is a just God who presides over
destiny of nations.
Another American hero you never
hear about in school, Daniel Webster, 1821, said,
if we abide by the principles taught in the Bible, our country will go on
prospering and to prosper. But
if we and our posterity neglect its instruction
and authority, no man can tell how sudden a catastrophe may overwhelm us,
all our glory in profound obscurity.
Abraham Lincoln declared, "it
is fit and becoming in all people, at all times,
to acknowledge and revere the supreme government of God. Abraham Lincoln also
said, I believe the Bible is the best gift ever given to man. All the good from
the Savior of the world is communicated to us thru this Book.
Thomas Jefferson said, I hold
the precepts of Jesus, as delivered by Himself, to
be the most pure, benevolent, and sublime which have ever been preached to
In 1781, he said, God, who gave us life, gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a
nation be thought secure, when we have removed their only firm base, a conviction
in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift of God. I tremble for
my country when I reflect that God is just.
Thomas Jefferson introduced a
bill in the State of Virginia, passed in 1785, that
guaranteed religious freedom.
It reads in part, "we, the general assembly of
Virginia, do enact that no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any
religious worship, place, or ministry, whatever, nor shall be enforced, molested,
or burdened, in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer, on account
religious opinions or beliefs. But
that all men shall be free to profess, and by
arguement, to maintain, their opinions, in matters of religion".
In section three, he declared that these rights are the natural rights of
and any future assembly that would try to repeal this act would be guilty
trying to infringe a natural right that has been given by God and cannot be
away by the State. Not even the
Supreme Court of the State.
Religious freedom is still our
natural right, no matter how much today's judges
try to outlaw it.
The anti-religious forces in america
have done a lot of screaming about Thomas
Jefferson's letter to a baptist church, that used the term 'wall of separation'
between church and state.
Let's see what he really meant.
He wrote the letter in 1802 in
answer to a letter the Danbury Baptist
wrote him in in 1801. The Danbury
Baptists were concerned that their religious
freedoms were not considered inalienable rights granted by God, but temporary
priviledges priviledges granted by the state government.
In this letter, he assured the Danbury
Church that their rights to religious
freedom were indeed inalienable, given by God, and could not be removed by
The famous sentence says, "I
contemplate, with solemn reverence, that act of the
whole American people, which declared that their legislatures should make
respecting the establishment of a religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
therof, thus building a wall of separation between Church and State".
It is clear to anyone who can think and read at the same time, that Jefferson is
stating that the First Amendment, which tops off the Bill of Rights,
absolutely forbids the State from claiming, or exercising any authority that
restrict, censor, restrain, or hinder in any way the activities of the church.
The state's legislative power to make laws does not extend to the activities
the church. The State's courts
power to interpret laws does not extend to the
hindering the free exercise of religion.
No State Legislature may pass laws that
forbid people from praying, or telling them where they may or may not pray,
censor the Holy Bible in any way.
The courts, as the judiciary
arm of the State, are bound by that same
restriction. They do not have
the right or authority to amend or nullify the Bill
The Courts do not outrank the President.
The Courts do not outrank the
Legislature. The Courts do not
outrank the Bill of Rights. They do not have the
authority to issue any orders
that restrict, censor, restrain, or hinder in any
way the activities of the church, in either public or private places.
This term 'separation of church and state' has been twisted inside out, and made
to mean the very opposite of what Jefferson
meant by it, and then activist judges
have tried to give this this sick, twisted, pretended meaning, the force of
which it does not have. these activist judges use their twisted version of
sentence to give an official sounding cover to their unlawful, un-American,
anti-Constitutional, worthless court orders and rulings.
The rulings of the courts on
religious matters, ever since Murray v. Board of
Education in 1962, are not lawful rulings.
They are not lawful rulings, because
to enforce them means to trash the Bill of Rights and declare that freedom
religion is not our law any more.
These are tyrannical usurpations
of power, intended to totally smother the free
operation of the Christian church, and the free practice of religion. Justice
William Rehnquist, in Wallace v. Jaffrey, 1984, declared, the greatest injury
the 'wall' notion, is its mischievous diversion of the judges from the actual
intentions of the drafters of the Bill of Rights. There is simply no historical
foundation. It should be frankly
and explicitly abandoned.
President John Quincy Adams,
declared, the highest glory of the American
Revolution, was, it connected in one indisoluble bond, the principles of civil
government, and the principles of Christianity.
President John Quincy Adams declared it.
Hear it again. The highest glory of the
American Revolution was, it connected in one indisoluble bond the principles of
civil government and the principles of Christianity. unquote.
All of our Founding Fathers agreed.
Our civil government was based upon the law of God revealed in the Holy Bible.
The Bible was the required textbook in every schoolroom in the United States, from
first grade thru college. It
was not to be censored or forbidden to be published
in any public or private place. Most
of the colleges in early America were
founded as seminaries to educate ministers of the gospel. In the Northwest
Territories, that had not yet become States, the Bible was required as a textbook
in every classroom.
This wedding of civil government with the principles of Christianity, produced
greatest, grandest, most progressive, most powerful, most glorious country
ever existed anywhere in human history.
The Supreme Court of this glorious
country, in its 1892 ruling, declared that no law anyplace in this country
power or authority to restrict
the Christian religion in any way.
Then something happened in the
world. A new philosophy was born, called
humanism. Its basic teaching
was that man is the highest being existing, there is
no god, no standard of right and wrong, and that every man is answerable only
himself for his actions.
There came a new political
movement, led by Karl Marx, that took this humanism,
and wed it to political tyranny. It
was called communism then. Communism
declared that any kind of belief in God was evil and dangerous, and had to
suppressed by government tyranny and wiped from the heart and mind of mankind.
The constant wars of the entire 20th century were an attempt to impose this
tyranny on the whole world. The
communist party spread its suffocating oppression
from Russia, to Europe, and to other parts of the world. Their intent was
the whole world godless. The
communist leaders taunted free America
threat of 'we will bury you'.
Communist idiology has spread
through all the world, including America. Thru the
generations since its beginning, communism has put on new faces and new names. It
is variously called marxism, communism, socialism, new world order fascism, and
it is called left wing liberalism. But it is the same agenda.
The successive generations of
believers in this agenda have never given up their
fight to outlaw God. America felt the first punch of this tyrannical fist in
Murray vs. the Board of Education, 1962. The
only thing the court had a right to
rule in that case was, the constitution gives every child the right to pray if he
wants and the right to not pray if he does not want. Little William Murray could
not be ordered to pray. But neither
could the court order all other children not
to pray. The judges on that bench
decided to trash their oath to protect the
Constitution, and decided to declare the Bill of Rights null and void. The ruling
was a usurpation of power that
they did not have, and was an impeachable offense.
These judges trampled on the entire history of what the United States is and what
we stand for, and decided to ban the free excercise of religion, just like
marxist countries have done. We
learned last time about the right of enforcement.
the Supreme Court does not have the right to call out the army or the police
arrest little childeren for praying.
They therefore do not have the right to
order them to stop praying. Who
said such an outrageous thing? Alexander
Hamilton, that's who. No judge on any bench
in any court in this country has the
right to declare the Bill of Rights unconstitutional.
United States Constitution, article three, section one. The judicial power of the
United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and such inferior courts as
the congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the
Supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour.
Good behaviour. Trying to wipe out the Bill of Rights is not good behaviour.
These judges have been so emboldened
by their success in suffocating religious
freedom, that they are now attacking all the other guarantees of the Bill
According to a recent ruling, you don't own your home anymore!
Although the Bill of Rights guarantees every citizen to be secure in his goods
property, the Supreme Court has just recently declared that that doesn't apply
some rich business conglomerate can pursuade your mayor that your land would
better used as a golf course or a parking lot!
United States Constitution, article five.
The Congress, whenever two thirds of
both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this
Constitution, or on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the
several States, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which in
case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution,
when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several States,
conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification
may be proposed by the Congress.
What we the people need is a constitutional amendment re-organizing the judicial
branch of government, eliminating the un-elected tyrant for life jobs.
Let federal judges be answerable to the people, like every other public servant
the country. Let the judge continue
to be nominated by the president, just like
now, with the advise and consent of the senate, just like now. Then, after a ten
year term on the bench, let them stand for public election like everyone else.
Let the vote be yes, retain for another ten year term, or no, do not retain.
People make the claim, you don't want to make the judge declare ahead of time
he might vote on something.
OH, YES. WE DO!!!!. We have the right to know that whatever question comes
before any particular judge, HE OR SHE WILL RULE FOR WHAT THE CONSTITUTION
NOT WHAT HE WANTS THE COBSTITUTION TO SAY!!!
People will complain, and say, oh,
we want to keep the judges out of politics.
We don't want to tamper with the
constitution. THESE JUDGES
ARE ALREADY DROWNING IN THEIR OWN LEFT-WING
They have already tampered with
the constitution. They have not only TAMPERED
with it, they have SHREDDED it, CHEWED IT UP, and SPIT IT OUT.
it was during the war for independence
that francis scott key wrote the star
there are four verses to our national anthem.
the fourth verse says,
oh, thus be it ever, when free men shall stand between their loved homes,
war's desolation. blessed
with victory and peace, may the heaven rescued land,
praise the power that has made, and preserved us a nation. then conquer we must,
when our cause it is just. and
this be our motto, in God is our trust. and the
star spangled banner in triumph shall wave, o'r the land of the free and the
of the brave.
in God we trust has been our
motto since our beginning. the words in God we
trust are in our national anthem.
our national anthem is a prayer of
thanksgiving to God.
it is only a matter of time before some enemy of the first amendment who happens
to wear a judge's robe, tells us that our national anthem is unconstitutional,
because it is a prayer of thanksgiving to Almighty God, is a public recognition
god and religion, and he orders it never to be sung in public again.
when that happens, maybe we will finally understand what these enemies of
guaranted freedoms are trying to do.
they are trying to pull down
the very foudations of America and bring
under the same historic tyranny that we fought and died to overthrow.
it is the same tyranny that exists in china and hundreds of other countries
we the people have the right and the duty to remove tyrants from office.
we should no longer bow our backs before enemies of the bill of rights.
any judge issuing and order that overrides and overrules the bill of rights
be removed from the bench. the
american way to do that is constitutional
we fired a king once. we declared our liberty from george 111. getting rid of
enemies of freedom is what america
has always done best.
the united states
constitution gives we the people the power and authority to
amend the constitution. these
enemies of the first amendment need to be told, you
the bill of rights long enough. you're fired.